Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 03:45

What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
macOS Tahoe Name Leaked Ahead of Apple's WWDC Event Next Week - MacRumors
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Scientists discover universal rule that governs all life on Earth - The Brighter Side of News
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Compass files lawsuit against Zillow over private home listings policy - AP News
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Nvidia and Perplexity Team Up in European AI Push - WSJ
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Mariners' vibes turn ugly after sweep: 'Nobody feels sorry for us' - The Seattle Times
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The FC Bayern squad for the Club World Cup - FC Bayern Munich